Mini Lesson Brainstorming
I teach a small-group math class
for students with a variety of learning disabilities, and I plan on using word
problems and right triangle trigonometry in my mini lessons. When working with
word problems that relate to the “real world,” students are given a picture of
how a particular concept may be used. Most teachers teach the formula and then
list numbers that students must plug in the formula. When a teacher gives the
students a word problem, they are required to figure out which piece of
information correlates with which part of the formula. Due to the complexity, this
may involve me as a teacher spending more time to come up with problems that relate
to each student’s life.
I plan on using a few types of
assessment. I will assign the students a project – to create their own word
problem that involves solving using trigonometric ratios, which addresses
Principle 1 (Implementing Inquiry,
n.d., p. 2). This assignment will also have a rubric to help guide them through
this thinking and brainstorming process. Additionally, their word problems will
relate to a “real-world” situation, addressing Principle 2 (Implementing Inquiry, n.d., p. 6). After
they create their word problems, I would like to have the students use
Educreations to present and solve their problems. This will be shared with me
digitally, and I will grade according to the rubric presented. The rubric is in
place not only to help structure the students’ projects but also to provide a
road map to help explain their learning goals and deepen their understanding,
addressing Principle 3 and Principle 4 (Implementing
Inquiry, n.d., p. 9; Implementing
Inquiry, n.d., p. 11). After necessary
changes are made and each one is accepted, I will have the students help me
create a Kahoot! quiz (or some type of quiz using technology) with the word
problems that they each made. The class will then get to work through each of
their peers’ problems. Naturally, the use of technology in this project
addresses Principle 5 (Implementing
Inquiry, n.d., p. 14).
Since the students’ work is going
to be used in a game for the entire class, I believe that they will try a
little harder (hopefully). Instead of just reading word problems that I
assigned them on a worksheet, solving the problem, and moving on to the next
one, they are having to move from being “passive learners to being active
learners” (Keren-Kolb, 2013, p. 22). The students are being challenged to use
technology in solving their problems, which is a little different for them. By
having the students “teach” their word problem on Educreations, the other
students in the class will be able to refer to this if they answer the question
wrong. Some of the disabilities that my students have hinder them from
preforming to their full potential in front of a crowd (which is why they are
placed in a “small group” environment), but if they recorded themselves
teaching in an environment by themselves, this would not be an issue. It could
just be played back, having them still “Publicly demonstrate understanding” (Implementing Inquiry, n.d., p. 18),
addressing Principle 6. Therefore, students have access to multimedia that
provides them the necessary information upon request, addressing Principle 8 (Implementing Inquiry, n.d., p. 22). This application would also help them in
demonstrating their understanding of the content in a way that they could not
using traditional tools (Keren-Kolb, 2013, p. 22).
Also, with using Educreations, I
can begin my lesson by showing students an example of one that I have created,
perhaps consulting someone in an outside field for help on developing my
example word problem, addressing Principle 7 (Implementing Inquiry, n.d., p. 20). As Tolisano (2013) states, “Only with that new kind of
experience in learning, collaborating, communicating, thinking… can we not only
understand but also adapt and tweak the technology tools to serve as
tools FOR modern literacies, student learning and amplification.”
References
Implementing
Inquiry.
(n.d.) Retrieved from http://images.pcmac.org/Uploads/MadisonCityAL/MadisonCityAL/SubDepartments/DocumentsCategories/Documents/Implementing-Inquiry.pdf
Keren-Kolb, L. (2013, May). Engage, enhance,
and extend learning! Learning &
Leading with Technology, 40(7),
20-27.
Tolisano, S. R.
(2013, May 29). Get over it! Retrieved from http://langwitches.org/blog/2013/05/29/get-over-it/
I really like your idea to have the students create their own problems. I agree with you that this will be motivational for the students. Creating a word problem would require the student to apply knowledge about the content. It would be very hard to create a concept if you didn't understand it. I'm not even going to lie, I couldn't create a word problem about trigonometric ratios. I would have to study up on that!
ReplyDelete